Sunday, June 1, 2025
Your Health 247
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Health
  • Fitness
  • Diseases
  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Meditation
  • Wellbeing Tips
  • Suppliments
  • Yoga
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Health
  • Fitness
  • Diseases
  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Meditation
  • Wellbeing Tips
  • Suppliments
  • Yoga
No Result
View All Result
Your Health 247
No Result
View All Result
Home Health

Failure to adopt covid suppression strategy led to avoidable deaths in the UK

Your Health 247 by Your Health 247
May 12, 2025
in Health
0 0
0
Failure to adopt covid suppression strategy led to avoidable deaths in the UK
0
SHARES
23
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter



Early in the covid-19 pandemic, the failure of UK government advisers to follow World Health Organization (WHO) advice and emerging evidence from East Asia that suppression could bring the virus under control quickly led to avoidable UK deaths, argues an expert in The BMJ today.

Suppression aims to avoid national lockdowns and maintain economic activity for most of the population by introducing surveillance systems to bring new outbreaks under control quickly, thus reducing the reproductive rate of infection (R0) to below 1 and causing the epidemic to wither.

Anthony Costello, professor of global health at University College London says, had the UK followed a suppression strategy, it might have prevented thousands of deaths. He asks why long term strategies of suppression continue to be under-recognised and calls for better governance of UK pandemic science advice.

In January 2020 the global threat from covid-19 was clear and the WHO was advising countries to focus on rapid suppression to avoid immediate threat from the spread of the new coronavirus, he explains.

Yet while Greece, Germany, Norway, and Ireland took steps to follow these recommendations, the UK government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) unanimously chose a response based on pandemic flu that ignored the different characteristics of coronavirus transmission.

Nor did SAGE change its advice after reports of rapidly falling cases and infection rates in several East Asian countries that had focused on suppression. Instead, in March 2020, the government published its “contain, delay, research, mitigate” plan based on influenza that would allow the virus to spread to achieve “herd immunity.”

SAGE’s unwavering decision to recommend a response based on influenza has continued to be defended by its co-chairs, Chris Whitty, England’s chief medical officer, and Patrick Vallance, chief scientific adviser until 2023, notes Costello. Yet their defence is based on three arguably mistaken assumptions: that covid could not have been suppressed, that a huge second wave could follow even if it was, and that suppression required prolonged national lockdowns.

He acknowledges that SAGE faced a difficult and fast changing situation in early 2020 but says its advice to government was “flawed” and “arose from systems failure.”

For instance, SAGE did not recommend rapid expansion of testing, form plans to mobilise community health workers as contact tracers at scale to hotspot areas and across district health protection teams, or advise on key financial and support measures for effective self-isolation, he writes.

“Had the UK followed the same strategy and achieved the same excess cumulative death rate by March 2024 as South Korea, 69 instead of 344 deaths per 100,000, it might have prevented up to 180,000 UK deaths.”

The BMJ asked Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance why they had not recommended a suppression response, given WHO advice and emerging evidence early in the pandemic; about SAGE’s lack of independent experts; why they were not more outspoken about health harming policies; and whether they stand by the recommendations they made not to focus on suppression, but had not received a response by the time of publication.

Costello points out that, five years on, many of the people who developed the UK’s flawed response are still in post; they have not changed their views on suppression, and little has been done to improve government pandemic advice committees or to introduce detailed governance rules for the UK’s future pandemic response and resilience. 

“The covid inquiry and the UK medical establishment should properly critique this public health failure,” he concludes.

Source:

Journal reference:

Analysis: UK decision not to suppress covid raises questions about medical and scientific advice. The BMJ. doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2025-082463



Source link

Tags: adoptavoidableCOVIDdeathsfailureledstrategysuppression
Previous Post

How One Health System Drove Revenue Gains with Ambient Listening

Next Post

How to Choose the Perfect Watch According to Astrology

Next Post
How to Choose the Perfect Watch According to Astrology

How to Choose the Perfect Watch According to Astrology

Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube RSS
Your Health 247

Discover the latest in health and fitness with Your Health 247. Get expert advice, workout routines, healthy recipes, and mental wellness tips to lead a healthier, happier life. Stay informed and empowered with us!

CATEGORIES

  • Diseases
  • Fitness
  • Health
  • Meditation
  • Nutrition
  • Suppliments
  • Weight Loss
  • Wellbeing Tips
  • Yoga
No Result
View All Result

SITEMAP

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact us

Copyright © 2025 Your Health 24 7.
Your Health 24 7 is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Health
  • Fitness
  • Diseases
  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Meditation
  • Wellbeing Tips
  • Suppliments
  • Yoga

Copyright © 2025 Your Health 24 7.
Your Health 24 7 is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In