Many people fear that a few days without exercise is a step toward getting smaller, fatter, and weaker.
This mindset is particularly common among beginner weightlifters, who are often afraid to lose what little “aesthetics” they have.
Here’s the reality, though: you’ll have to endure periods where you can’t train, whether due to injury, family commitments, a frantic work schedule, or some other shenanigan.
And when this happens, you’ll probably notice your body doesn’t change as dramatically as you thought it might (or at all).
This is largely thanks to a phenomenon known as muscle memory, which helps you regain lost muscle and strength much faster than gaining it from scratch.
In other words, even if you have to take time away from lifting weights, once you get back to training, you’ll quickly regain any size and strength you lost.
How does muscle memory work, though? Does it last forever? And how does it benefit people looking to build muscle?
Get evidence-based answers to those questions and more in this article.
What Is Muscle Memory?
Muscle memory describes the phenomenon of muscle fibers regaining size and strength faster than initially gaining them.
In other words, muscle memory makes it much easier to regain lost muscle and strength than to build them from scratch.
For example, if you follow a good strength training program for a year, build a lot of muscle, but then take a break and lose some of those gains, you’ll find it takes less time to regain the lost muscle than it did to build it in the first place.
Although this article focuses on muscle memory in weight training, the same principle of “hard to gain, easier to regain” holds true for many other skills and physical processes. Other examples of muscle memory include:
Regaining your aerobic capacity after a break is much easier than building it up initially.
Getting back on a bike and riding smoothly is much easier than when you first learned, even if decades have passed.
Relearning to play a song on the piano is significantly easier than the first time you try.
How Does Muscle Memory Work?
The theory of muscle memory works like this:
Most cells in the human body contain a nucleus, which you can think of as the cell’s brain—it controls and regulates the cell’s activities.
Muscle cells are unique in that they can contain multiple nuclei—known as myonuclei—which carry the DNA needed to build new muscle proteins. As muscle cells have multiple “brains,” they can grow much larger than most other cells in the body.
However, each myonuclei can only manage so much muscle—this is known as a muscle cell’s myonuclear domain. To continue getting bigger, a muscle cell must add more myonuclei.
The catch is muscle cells can’t produce myonuclei—they must take them from stem cells.
Of all the different stem cells in the body, a kind called satellite cells play the most significant role in muscle growth. Satellite cells attach themselves to damaged muscle cells and donate their nuclei, which aids in repair and increases the cells’ capacity for growth.
And this is how scientists believe that muscle memory works: once a satellite cell has donated a nucleus to a muscle cell, it stays there.
This means you can regain muscle you’ve lost much quicker than you can gain muscle you never had because your muscle cells don’t need to recruit new satellite cells to grow back to their former glory. Instead, they can simply fire up the muscle-building machinery that’s been dormant.
Is Muscle Memory Real?
So far, we’ve discussed the theory behind how muscle memory works. But is muscle memory real?
That is, does it actually play out in practice?
A study conducted by Maastricht University examined 60 animal studies and 16 human studies on this topic. About half of these studies found that myonuclei remain in muscle cells when training stops, while the other half found that they disappear.
Importantly, however, when you unravel the study details further, you find that the more methodologically sound studies tended to show that myonuclei stick around in muscle cells after the person (or animal) stopped working out.
While this seems like good evidence muscle memory is real, a 2024 study published in The Journal of Physiology made things fuzzier.
It had people train one biceps for 10 weeks, stop training for 16 weeks, and then train both biceps for a further 10 weeks. The results showed that the previously trained biceps lost size after the break, but the myonuclei gained during initial training remained.
Nevertheless, the trained arm didn’t grow faster than the untrained arm in the second training phase, despite having more myonuclei.
Many fitness “thought leaders” argued this shows that while myonuclei stay after training stops, they may not significantly contribute to muscle memory.
It’s certainly possible, but a more plausible explanation has to do with individual differences between the people involved in the study.
Specifically, one person lost muscle in the trained arm but gained about 50% in the control arm, which skewed the overall results. When you remove this outlier, the results showed that the trained arms with more myonuclei grew faster.
In other words, research on whether muscle memory is real can seem inconsistent at first blush. But when you look more closely, you find that the most rigorous research shows that muscle memory is indeed a real phenomenon, likely driven by the myonuclear domain theory.
Does Muscle Memory Last Forever?
Most research suggests that myonuclei are at least semi-permanent. That is, they seem to outlast muscle fibers, but whether muscle memory lasts forever is unclear.
Results from high-quality animal research are split, with some studies showing myonuclei last forever, and others showing they dwindle with inactivity.
Human studies follow a similar pattern—some research suggests myonuclei remain indefinitely, while other studies hint that they decline over time.
Given these inconsistencies, the most reasonable conclusion is that you likely lose myonuclei during periods of prolonged inactivity, but not as quickly as muscle fibers shrink.
Thus, while muscle memory may not last forever, it likely persists for several years, particularly in younger folks (who typically have larger myonuclear domains).
How Long Does it Take to Regain Muscle Mass After a Layoff?
There’s no hard and fast rule about how long it takes to regain muscle mass after a layoff because it largely depends on your training experience, how long you’ve been inactive, and your age.
Nevertheless, most research and experts agree that you can regain lost muscle fairly quickly once you start training again.
Dr. Mike Zourdos, a professor of exercise science at Florida Atlantic University and a powerlifting coach, estimates it takes about half as long to regain lost muscle and strength as it did to lose it. In other words, if you take 4-to-6 months off, you’ll probably need 2-to-3 months to get back to where you were.
While this guideline applies in most cases, keep in mind that if you take a break from training for several years or are older, it may take significantly longer to recoup your gains.
Can Muscle Memory Benefit Bodybuilders?
Part of the reason new weightlifters rapidly build muscle (“newbie gains”) is their bodies easily activate satellite cells after workouts, resulting in large infusions of myonuclei into muscle cells.
This process slows as you gain muscle, as it becomes increasingly difficult to keep adding new nuclei to muscle cells.
Some seasoned weightlifters believe you can use muscle memory to “hack” this slowdown and keep making gains like a newbie, even after your first 6-to-12 months of training.
Their theory is that by occasionally stopping resistance training for a couple of weeks, you can enjoy a period of “hyper-responsiveness” when you restart (and without losing any muscle or strength to speak of while you rest).
Basically, the idea is newbie gains writ small. By inserting just enough detraining into your regimen, the argument goes, you can reactivate a brief and diluted form of the physiological advantage you enjoyed in your first year of training.
While it’s an interesting hypothesis, no studies have shown it to be true, and I personally haven’t seen much anecdotal evidence to support it.
That said, there’s evidence that at least for the first six months or so, people new to weightlifting can take a few several-week breaks and still make just as much progress as training straight through.
So, while the “resensitizing” theory is probably false and offers no physiological advantages over traditional programming, taking a few weeks off of the gym now and then won’t set you back much if at all (especially if you’re new).
That means you can enjoy that vacation with a guilt-free conscience. Or recover from that injury patiently. Or bend your energies to a sport for a bit while putting weightlifting on the backburner. Don’t worry. Your muscles will be ready for a quick and triumphant return.
FAQ #1: How long does muscle memory take to “kick in?”
How fast muscle memory works depends on several factors, such as how much muscle you had before, how long you’ve been inactive, and your age. Generally, people regain lost muscle much faster if:
The layoff was short
They’re not elderly
They had already spent several years training
That said, most people can expect it to take about half as long to regain lost muscle and strength as it did to lose it.
FAQ #2: How long does it take to build muscle memory?
It’s hard to say exactly how long it takes to build muscle memory because it varies from person to person.
The best way to think about it is like this: You start building muscle memory as soon as you begin training consistently. The longer you train, the more myonuclei you accumulate in your muscle cells, which makes regaining lost muscle after a period of inactivity easier.
FAQ #3: How long does muscle memory last?
Muscle memory doesn’t last forever, but it likely lasts for several years. Recent research suggests that myonuclei remain in muscle cells for a long time but are eventually lost, especially if you’re older or had a long layoff.
FAQ #4: How do you develop muscle memory?
The best way to build muscle memory in bodybuilding is to train consistently for several years. According to the myonuclei theory of muscle memory, this changes the cellular structure of your muscles, which makes it easier to regain any muscle and strength you lose after a period of detraining.
FAQ #5: Can you do muscle memory exercises?
To make use of muscle memory you must first build muscle, which means the best “muscle memory exercises” are exercises that help you build muscle effectively.
Here are the best muscle-building exercises you can do for each major muscle group:
Scientific References +
Godfrey, R.J. , et al. The Detraining and Retraining of an Elite Rower: A Case Study. Oct. 2005, pp. 314–20, www.researchgate.net/publication/7519163_The_detraining_and_retraining_of_an_elite_rower_A_case_study, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1440-2440(05)80042-8.
Bruusgaard, J. C., et al. “No Change in Myonuclear Number during Muscle Unloading and Reloading.” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 113, no. 2, 15 July 2012, pp. 290–296, https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00436.2012. Accessed 12 May 2021.
Egner, Ingrid M., et al. “A Cellular Memory Mechanism Aids Overload Hypertrophy in Muscle Long after an Episodic Exposure to Anabolic Steroids.” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 591, no. 24, 22 Nov. 2013, pp. 6221–6230, https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2013.264457. Accessed 30 Mar. 2020.
Qaisar, R., and L. Larsson. “What Determines Myonuclear Domain Size?” Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 58, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1–12, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25464670/. Accessed 8 Apr. 2023.
Bazgir, Behzad, et al. “Satellite Cells Contribution to Exercise Mediated Muscle Hypertrophy and Repair.” Cell Journal (Yakhteh), vol. 18, no. 4, 2017, pp. 473–484, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5086326/.
Sambasivan, Ramkumar, and Shahragim Tajbakhsh. “Adult Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells.” Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, vol. 56, 2015, pp. 191–213, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25344672/, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44608-9_9. Accessed 1 Dec. 2021.
CONCEIÇÃO, MIGUEL S., et al. “Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy and Myonuclei Addition.” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 50, no. 7, July 2018, pp. 1385–1393, https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000001593.
Eriksson, Anders . Strenght Training and Anabolic Steroids : A Comparative Study of the Trapezius, a Shoulder Muscle and the Vastus Lateralis, a Thigh Muscle, of Strength Trained Athletes. Jan. 2006, www.researchgate.net/publication/277742390_Strenght_training_and_anabolic_steroids_a_comparative_study_of_the_trapezius_a_shoulder_muscle_and_the_vastus_lateralis_a_thigh_muscle_of_strength_trained_athletes63 6gt45 ggt6\ g gg bg ;l..
Snijders, Tim, et al. “The Concept of Skeletal Muscle Memory: Evidence from Animal and Human Studies.” Acta Physiologica (Oxford, England), vol. 229, no. 3, 1 July 2020, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317456/, https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13465.
Kristoffer Toldnes Cumming, et al. “Muscle Memory in Humans: Evidence for Myonuclear Permanence and Long‐Term Transcriptional Regulation after Strength Training.” The Journal of Physiology, 19 Aug. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1113/jp285675. Accessed 13 Sept. 2024.
Bruusgaard, Jo C., and Kristian Gundersen. “In Vivo Time-Lapse Microscopy Reveals No Loss of Murine Myonuclei during Weeks of Muscle Atrophy.” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 118, no. 4, 1 Apr. 2008, pp. 1450–1457, https://doi.org/10.1172/jci34022. Accessed 4 July 2021.
Viguie CA;Lu DX;Huang SK;Rengen H;Carlson BM. “Quantitative Study of the Effects of Long-Term Denervation on the Extensor Digitorum Longus Muscle of the Rat.” The Anatomical Record, vol. 248, no. 3, 2015, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9214552/, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199707)248:3%3C346::AID-AR7%3E3.0.CO;2-N. Accessed 13 Sept. 2024.
Schmalbruch H;Lewis DM. “Dynamics of Nuclei of Muscle Fibers and Connective Tissue Cells in Normal and Denervated Rat Muscles.” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 23, no. 4, 2024, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10716774/, https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(200004)23:4%3C617::aid-mus22%3E3.0.co;2-y. Accessed 13 Sept. 2024.
Kramer, Irene Fleur, et al. “Extensive Type II Muscle Fiber Atrophy in Elderly Female Hip Fracture Patients.” The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, vol. 72, no. 10, 20 Jan. 2017, pp. 1369–1375, https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glw253. Accessed 27 Apr. 2020.
VERDIJK, LEX B., et al. “Reduced Satellite Cell Numbers with Spinal Cord Injury and Aging in Humans.” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 44, no. 12, Dec. 2012, pp. 2322–2330, https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3182667c2e. Accessed 9 Mar. 2021.
Verdijk, Lex B., et al. “Satellite Cells in Human Skeletal Muscle; from Birth to Old Age.” AGE, vol. 36, no. 2, 12 Oct. 2013, pp. 545–557, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-013-9583-2.
Karlsen, Anders, et al. “Matters of Fiber Size and Myonuclear Domain: Does Size Matter More than Age?” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 52, no. 6, 28 Sept. 2015, pp. 1040–1046, https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24669. Accessed 7 Mar. 2023.
Dreyer, Hans C., et al. “Satellite Cell Numbers in Young and Older Men 24 Hours after Eccentric Exercise.” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 33, no. 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 242–253, https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20461. Accessed 11 Dec. 2019.
Verdijk, Lex B., et al. “Satellite Cell Content Is Specifically Reduced in Type II Skeletal Muscle Fibers in the Elderly.” American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 292, no. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. E151–E157, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00278.2006.
VERDIJK, LEX B., et al. “Resistance Training Increases Skeletal Muscle Capillarization in Healthy Older Men.” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 48, no. 11, Nov. 2016, pp. 2157–2164, https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000001019. Accessed 27 Apr. 2020.
Karlsen, Anders, et al. “Lack of Muscle Fibre Hypertrophy, Myonuclear Addition, and Satellite Cell Pool Expansion with Resistance Training in 83‐94‐Year‐Old Men and Women.” Acta Physiologica, 20 Mar. 2019, p. e13271, https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13271. Accessed 1 May 2020.
Staron, R. S., et al. “Strength and Skeletal Muscle Adaptations in Heavy-Resistance-Trained Women after Detraining and Retraining.” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 70, no. 2, 1 Feb. 1991, pp. 631–640, https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1991.70.2.631. Accessed 28 Jan. 2020.
McHugh, Malachy P. “Recent Advances in the Understanding of the Repeated Bout Effect: The Protective Effect against Muscle Damage from a Single Bout of Eccentric Exercise.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, vol. 13, no. 2, Apr. 2003, pp. 88–97, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.02477.x. Accessed 8 May 2019.
McMahon, Gerard E., et al. “Impact of Range of Motion during Ecologically Valid Resistance Training Protocols on Muscle Size, Subcutaneous Fat, and Strength.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 28, no. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 245–255, https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e318297143a.
Jespersen, J. G., et al. “Myostatin Expression during Human Muscle Hypertrophy and Subsequent Atrophy: Increased Myostatin with Detraining.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, vol. 21, no. 2, 10 Mar. 2011, pp. 215–223, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01044.x.
Ogasawara, Riki, et al. “Comparison of Muscle Hypertrophy Following 6-Month of Continuous and Periodic Strength Training.” European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 113, no. 4, 6 Oct. 2012, pp. 975–985, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2511-9. Accessed 8 Aug. 2019.